We use Patch and Compliance in lieu of WSUS/SCCM for patching our production desktops and servers. The system works great for the most part. However, does anyone know the answer behind the redundancy in cases like this?
MS15-010_MSU and MS15-009_MSU both have an identical counterparts downloaded. Per this document, the MSU identifies patches that are compatible with Windows 7, 8, and Servers 2K8 and 2012. Awesome! However, does this mean I don't need the other one if I don't have any XP or 2003 in my environment? I can obviously err on the side of caution and throw both of them into my autofix scope, but does that mean BOTH patches will try and install on any given machine?